Comparative analysis

Subnet 69 vs Buttnet 69

Prepared in the interests of full disclosure

Bittensor already has a Subnet 69. It's called Herald, and it "only pays for genuine media coverage". We felt the ecosystem deserved to know how the two compare.

Subnet 69 — HeraldButtnet 69 — $BUTT69
ChainBittensorSolana, paired with TAO
PurposeAn on-chain marketplace that only pays for genuine media coverageOnly pays for genuine holding
MinersJournalists, publishers, people who write thingsTraders. Thank you for your service.
ValidatorsScore the coverageHold the bag
Work requiredProduce verifiable, genuine coverageSit
EmissionsSN69 alpha, from TAO emissions to the subnetTAO, from a 3% tax on every transfer
Emission scheduleEvery block, per the dTAO mechanismWhenever the platform runs a cycle, historically about hourly
RegistrationBurn TAO to register a hotkey; wait out the immunity periodBuy the token. There is no immunity period. No risk to your bag. Some risk to your butt.
DeregistrationFall to the bottom of emissions and get prunedSell. That's it. That's deregistration.
Subnet ownerThe Herald teamA bottom-weight visionary
Owner take18% of subnet emissions, per protocol0%.
ConsensusYuma consensusYeah consensus. Everyone agrees the number is funny.
RoadmapPresumablyTraders mine. Holders validate. Emissions in TAO.
Media coveragePaid for, if genuineFree, if funny
AffiliationWith Bittensor, formallyWith nobody.
WhitepaperProbably goodehhh…
Disclosure

Herald is a real subnet run by real people who have nothing to do with this. Everything in the left column is drawn from public descriptions of what it does and from how Bittensor subnets work in general. If any of it is wrong, tell us and we'll fix it. If any of it is funny, that was us.

Conclusion

Both subnets pay for something genuine. One of them requires you to write. The other requires you to not sell. We leave it to the reader to decide which is harder.